In this comparison, Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron leads on motorway range and running costs, while the Volvo EX90 leads on family practicality.
Choose the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron if...
Choose the Volvo EX90 if...
Our take
The Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £90,150 | £80,160 (better) |
| Official range | 372 miles (better) | 351 miles |
| Boot space | 511 L (better) | 324 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 21 min (better) | 22 min |
| 0-62 mph | 4.3 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,771 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,965 mm | 1,964 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,113 mm |
| Height | 1,680 mm | 1,744 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.1 m | 12 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 435 mm spare | 436 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 926 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 511 L (better) | 324 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1373 L | 2082 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,500 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX90
| Specification | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron Base | Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.77m | 5.04m+266mm |
| Width | 1.97m | 1.96m-1mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.11m |
| Height | 1.68m | 1.74m+64mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.98m+86mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 511L (better) | 324L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1373L | 2082L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 926mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.1m | 12m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,350kg (better) | 2,555kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 100kWh (better) | 92kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 372 mi (better) | 351 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 270kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £90,150 | £80,160 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 372 miles (better) | 351 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 309 miles (better) | 246 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 21 min (better) | 22 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 270 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 185 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 100 kWh (better) | 88 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 4.3 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
| Power | 380 kW (better) | 245 kW |
| Torque | 580 Nm (better) | 480 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron
Base
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Volvo EX90
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tronBase | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX90
The Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron costs £9,990 more than the Volvo EX90. For that premium it adds 187 litres more boot space, 135 kW more power and a 2.5s quicker 0-62mph time. The Volvo EX90 is not just cheaper - it also offers 80 kW faster peak rapid charging and 2 more seats (7 versus 5). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Volvo EX90 is £9,990 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £184 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Volvo EX90 comes out roughly £9,910 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 309 miles for the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron and 246 miles for the Volvo EX90 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron goes roughly 63 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 21-22 minutes.
The two are within 1 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 436 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX90 and about 435 mm of total clearance for the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron and 84% for the Volvo EX90. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi SQ6 Sportback e-tron comparisons
More Volvo EX90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .