In this comparison, Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs, while the Volvo EX90 leads on family practicality.
Choose the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron if...
Choose the Volvo EX90 if...
Our take
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
quattro
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £71,475 (better) | £80,160 |
| Official range | 390 miles (better) | 351 miles |
| Boot space | 511 L (better) | 324 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 22 min | 22 min |
| 0-62 mph | 5.9 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,771 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,939 mm (better) | 1,964 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,193 mm | 2,113 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,665 mm | 1,744 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.1 m | 12 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 461 mm spare (better) | 436 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 926 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 511 L (better) | 324 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1373 L | 2082 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 2,000 kg (better) | 1,500 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX90
| Specification | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron quattro | Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.77m | 5.04m+266mm |
| Width | 1.94m | 1.96m+25mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.19m | 2.11m-80mm |
| Height | 1.67m | 1.74m+79mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.89m | 2.98m+96mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 511L (better) | 324L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1373L | 2082L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 926mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.1m | 12m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,150kg (better) | 2,555kg |
| Towing Capacity | 2,000kg (better) | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 100kWh (better) | 92kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 390 mi (better) | 351 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 270kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £71,475 (better) | £80,160 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 390 miles (better) | 351 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 325 miles (better) | 246 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 22 min | 22 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 270 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 185 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 94.9 kWh (better) | 88 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.9 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
| Power | 285 kW (better) | 245 kW |
| Torque | 485 Nm (better) | 480 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
quattro

Volvo EX90
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronquattro | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 costs £8,685 more than the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. For that premium it adds 80 kW faster peak rapid charging and 2 more seats (7 versus 5). The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is not just cheaper - it also offers 39 miles more WLTP range, 187 litres more boot space and 40 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is £8,685 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron comes out roughly £8,805 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 325 miles for the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and 246 miles for the Volvo EX90 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes roughly 79 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 22-22 minutes.
The two are within 25 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 461 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX90.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and 84% for the Volvo EX90. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron comparisons
More Volvo EX90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q6 e-tron buyer’s guide: the 83 kWh, performance and quattro versions and the Sportback compared, warranty left, the ride and software issues owners report, realistic range, fast charging, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX90 buyer’s guide: the 400-volt 2024-2025 car vs the 800-volt 2026 upgrade, the free core computer swap, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .