In this comparison, Abarth 600e leads on motorway range and charging speed, while the Hyundai KONA Electric leads on value for money, family practicality and running costs.
Choose the Abarth 600e if...
Choose the Hyundai KONA Electric (2018-2023) if...
Our take
The Hyundai KONA Electric leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Turismo
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,995 | £29,495 (better) |
| Official range | 207 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 360 L (better) | 332 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 27 min (better) | 48 min |
| 0-62 mph | 6.2 sec (better) | 9.9 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,187 mm | 4,205 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,779 mm (better) | 1,800 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,981 mm (better) | 2,070 mm |
| Height | 1,557 mm | 1,570 mm |
| Turning circle | Not available | 10.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 621 mm spare (better) | 600 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 360 L (better) | 332 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1114 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Abarth 600e
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Hyundai KONA Electric
| Specification | Abarth 600e Turismo | Hyundai KONA Electric 39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.19m | 4.21m+18mm |
| Width | 1.78m | 1.80m+21mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.98m | 2.07m+89mm |
| Height | 1.56m | 1.57m+13mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.56m | 2.60m+41mm |
| Ground Clearance | 179mm | 170mm-9mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 360L (better) | 332L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1114L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | Not available | 10.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,640kg | 1,535kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 54kWh (better) | 39.2kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 207 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 44kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,995 | £29,495 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £32,495 (-£1,500) | £29,495 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2018–2020 |
* Abarth 600e: Not yet tested by Euro NCAP.
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Heat pump: an option on every trim, not standard.
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Manufacturer lists no towing capacity for the 39 kWh car.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 207 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 173 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 27 min (better) | 48 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 44 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.2 kW |
| Energy consumption | 152 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 50.8 kWh (better) | 36 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.2 sec (better) | 9.9 sec |
| Power | 176 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 395 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Abarth 600e
Turismo

Hyundai KONA Electric
39kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Abarth 600e Turismo
Not yet tested by Euro NCAP.
Tested 2017
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Abarth 600eTurismo | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Get a quote
Abarth 600e
Hyundai KONA Electric
The Abarth 600e costs £4,500 more than the Hyundai KONA Electric. For that premium it adds 56 kW faster peak rapid charging, 76 kW more power and a 3.7s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Hyundai KONA Electric comes out ahead overall.
The Hyundai KONA Electric is £4,500 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Hyundai KONA Electric comes out roughly £4,620 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 173 miles for the Abarth 600e and 158 miles for the Hyundai KONA Electric - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Abarth 600e goes roughly 16 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 27 minutes in the Abarth 600e and 48 in the Hyundai KONA Electric, so the Abarth 600e loses less time at each stop. That makes the Abarth 600e the stronger long-distance car.
The two are within 21 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 621 mm of total clearance for the Abarth 600e and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Hyundai KONA Electric.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Abarth 600e and 86% for the Hyundai KONA Electric. That gives the Hyundai KONA Electric a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Abarth 600e comparisons
More Hyundai KONA Electric comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .